Contract safeguarding in the new Civil Code

IMG_4485

2 octombrie, 2014

Bazil Oglinda a vorbit despre salvgardarea contractului in contextul noului Cod Civil si a propus o serie de abordari edificatoare pentru spetele complexe. 

IMG_4485

October 2, 2014

Bazil Oglinda spoke about the provisions for contract safeguarding, according the new Civil Code, and presented several approaches for addressing complex cases in this area. Prevederile noului Cod Civil, si implicit cele privind salvgardarea contractului, tin seama de cele mai moderne reglementari in materie: Principiile UNIDROIT, Principiile Europene ale contractelor, Draft common frame of refference si, nu in ultimul rând, reglementarile din Codul civil italian sau ale Codului  Civil Quebec.

 

Prezentarea a avut loc in cadrul conferintei organizata de Juridice.ro pentru a aborda “Problemele dificile de drept civil”.“Sanctiunea contractuala – nulitatea, rezolutiunea, rezilierea, etc – nu este un scop in sine”, explica Bazil Oglinda. “Ori de câte ori exista premisele salvării contractului, avocatul trebuie sa faca tot ce este posibil pentru asta. Mai mult, fiecare speta trebuie tratată prin prisma particularitatiilor ei, remediile contractuale trebuie aplicate gradual (ori de câte ori acest lucru este posibil) si nu direct cele mai dure sancțiuni contractuale. Nu in ultimul rand, avocatul, ca si alti actori importanti ai justitiei, are posibilitatea sa tina seama de principii fundamentale de drept ca principiul bunei-credinte, cooperarea (solidarismul) contractual si “Nemo propriam turpitudinem allegans”. Puteti accesa prezentarea lui Bazil Oglinda aici.

 

The presentation was made at the conference organized by Juridice.ro, in order to address “Difficult issues in civil law”. The provisions of the new Civil Code (regarding contract safeguarding), take into account the latest international regulation in the field: the UNIDROIT Principles, European contract Principles, the Draft common frame of reference, as well as the Italian Civil Code and the Quebec Civil Code.

 

”The contractual penalty – nullity, cancellation, termination etc. – is not a goal in itself”, explains Bazil Oglinda. “Whenever safeguarding seems possible, lawyers as well as the other stakeholders should go for it. Moreover, each case must be approached individually, as one of a kind, and contractual remedies should only be applied gradually (whenever possible), thus avoiding tough contractual penalties at the onset. ” Last but not least, the lawyer should take into account the fundamental law principles, such as the principle of good faith, contractual cooperation, as well as “Nemo propriam turpitudinem allegans”. You can acces the presentation of Bazil Oglinda here (Romanian only).

 

Tags

What do you think?

Related Articles

Game over for ownership? The strange case of virtual property.

On 7 May 2026, the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament reached a provisional political agreement on the Digital Omnibus on AI, a legislative package postponing by approximately 16 months the application of the strictest obligations under Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 on artificial intelligence.

Read

Aplicarea NIS2 în România

La data de 29.09.2026, Directoratul Național de Securitate Cibernetică (denumit în cadrul articolului ”DNSC”) a aplicat prima amendă în temeiul OUG nr. 155/2024, actul normativ prin care România a transpus Directiva NIS2.

Read